28+ Recipe Commences Before First Target. I checked the makefile at line 24 and tried adding a tab to the start of the line, but that didn’t work as i then get another error: If you give commands for a target which already has been defined to have commands, this.
I’m trying to install backyard brains’ spike recorder on my ubuntu 16.10 gnome laptop. If you give commands for a target which already has been defined to have commands, this. From what i can make out of my searches there is something wrong in the make file but based on the read out.
From What I Can Make Out Of My Searches There Is Something Wrong In The Make File But Based On The Read Out.
I run the configure file and i don't seem to get an error. I am trying to install allegro 4.2.2. A user posted a makefile with a syntax error that caused commands to start before the first target.
If You Give Commands For A Target Which Already Has Been Defined To Have Commands, This.
You don’t specify a target,. It’s complaining that no recipe was started for this line to be a part of. If you give commands for a target which already has been defined to have commands, this.
Another User Pointed Out The Problem And The Solution Was To Remove The.
It begins with a recipe prefix character and doesn't appear to be a legal make directive (such as a. The tab character is the prefix for recipe lines, so make assumes that this line is part of a recipe. The first warning indicates the line at which the second command script is found, while the second warning indicates the location of the original command script that is being overridden.
I Get The Error At The Else Statement:
But the last few lines state config.status: If i get it right, the formatting gone awry causes some problems to make once it has to build anything but the first target. *** recipe commences before first target.
*** Recipe Commences Before First Target.
This means the first thing in the makefile seems to be part of a recipe: I've resolved some problems but now i'm getting the error recipe commences before. It looks like it's treating the else as part of the above ifeq (1,0) line.